Methodology & data
We'd rather show our work than make you trust a black box. Here's everything the calculator uses.
Primary dataset
Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, Muir G, Hodsoll J. (2015). Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men. BJU International. Clinician-measured, bone-pressed, pooled from 17 studies.
| Metric | Mean | SD | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erect length | 13.12 cm | 1.66 | 692 |
| Erect girth | 11.66 cm | 1.10 | 381 |
| Stretched length | 13.24 cm | 1.89 | 14,160 |
| Flaccid length | 9.16 cm | 1.57 | 10,704 |
| Flaccid girth | 9.31 cm | 0.90 | 9,407 |
How percentiles are computed
For each metric we model the population as a normal (bell-curve) distribution using the mean
and standard deviation above. Your percentile is the cumulative probability below your
measurement: Φ((x − mean) / SD).
Volume models the shaft as a cylinder, V = (girth² ÷ 4π) × length; its percentile is a delta-method estimate.
Bone-pressed correction
The reference data is bone-pressed. If you measure non-bone-pressed, we add 1.0 cm to your length before comparing. Girth needs no correction.
Country comparison
Women's-preference reference
Where preference figures appear, they come from Prause et al. (2015), PLoS ONE, which used 3D-printed models rather than self-report.
Limitations
- Real distributions aren't perfectly normal, especially at the extremes.
- Erect-dimension sample sizes in Veale 2015 are smaller than stretched/flaccid.
- This tool is educational and is not a medical assessment.